1 |
I |
2 |
|
3 |
|
4 |
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 5:06 AM, Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com>wrote: |
5 |
|
6 |
> On 04/04/2013 10:15, Yuri K. Shatroff wrote: |
7 |
> > Well, an installer certainly would find its users. But none is perfect, |
8 |
> > and writing another (imperfect) one exclusively for Gentoo is sort of |
9 |
> > wasting time. A "true" Gentoo way IMO would be a selection of installers |
10 |
> > on the installation medium ;-) But AFAICT it is this idea that wouldn't |
11 |
> > be popular, rather than leaving no-installer at all. |
12 |
> |
13 |
> A true GentooWay installer would be any installer of your own choice |
14 |
> that launches the shell of your chosing, accepts any stage3 tarball that |
15 |
> you want and gotten from anywhere you choose to get it, and unpacked any |
16 |
> place you feel like putting it. It will then run the software of your |
17 |
> choice and install whatever you tell it to. |
18 |
> |
19 |
> That's an awful lot of "your choices" :-) |
20 |
> |
21 |
> |
22 |
> |
23 |
> -- |
24 |
> Alan McKinnon |
25 |
> alan.mckinnon@×××××.com |
26 |
> |
27 |
> |
28 |
> |
29 |
Isn't that exactly what the guide itself is? The only thing it doesn't make |
30 |
explicit is the choice of package manager and choice of shell, though that |
31 |
itself could be considered an advanced feature available to those |
32 |
experienced enough to know they want the choice, who are, I would |
33 |
hope, knowledgeable enough to make and enact that choice at the appropriate |
34 |
point in the install. The only feature the guide lacks is a pretty point |
35 |
and click interface that either over-clutters the user with options or |
36 |
denies them choices they might want, which I might add, the same could be |
37 |
said of portage itself. |
38 |
|
39 |
-- |
40 |
Poison [BLX] |
41 |
Joshua M. Murphy |