Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Joshua Murphy <poisonbl@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user <gentoo-user@l.g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: stage3 only for i486?
Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2013 12:30:53
Message-Id: CAOTuDKqbCkF1jhxNFjKdcPsOE-kmMtiz8ULHeEbZnoOkNOQ9rw@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: stage3 only for i486? by Alan McKinnon
1 I
2
3
4 On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 5:06 AM, Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com>wrote:
5
6 > On 04/04/2013 10:15, Yuri K. Shatroff wrote:
7 > > Well, an installer certainly would find its users. But none is perfect,
8 > > and writing another (imperfect) one exclusively for Gentoo is sort of
9 > > wasting time. A "true" Gentoo way IMO would be a selection of installers
10 > > on the installation medium ;-) But AFAICT it is this idea that wouldn't
11 > > be popular, rather than leaving no-installer at all.
12 >
13 > A true GentooWay installer would be any installer of your own choice
14 > that launches the shell of your chosing, accepts any stage3 tarball that
15 > you want and gotten from anywhere you choose to get it, and unpacked any
16 > place you feel like putting it. It will then run the software of your
17 > choice and install whatever you tell it to.
18 >
19 > That's an awful lot of "your choices" :-)
20 >
21 >
22 >
23 > --
24 > Alan McKinnon
25 > alan.mckinnon@×××××.com
26 >
27 >
28 >
29 Isn't that exactly what the guide itself is? The only thing it doesn't make
30 explicit is the choice of package manager and choice of shell, though that
31 itself could be considered an advanced feature available to those
32 experienced enough to know they want the choice, who are, I would
33 hope, knowledgeable enough to make and enact that choice at the appropriate
34 point in the install. The only feature the guide lacks is a pretty point
35 and click interface that either over-clutters the user with options or
36 denies them choices they might want, which I might add, the same could be
37 said of portage itself.
38
39 --
40 Poison [BLX]
41 Joshua M. Murphy