| 1 |
On Mon, 1 Feb 2016 05:04:14 -0500 Philip Webb wrote: |
| 2 |
> 160201 Andrew Savchenko wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Mon, 1 Feb 2016 09:03:50 +0000 Neil Bothwick wrote: |
| 4 |
> >> On Mon, 1 Feb 2016 05:56:37 +0100, Meino.Cramer@×××.de wrote: |
| 5 |
> >>> Switching to nvidia OpenCL interface... done |
| 6 |
> >>> * x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers is using the deprecated |
| 7 |
> >>> readme.gentoo.eclass. <<<????>>> |
| 8 |
> >>> * Please use readme.gentoo-r1 instead. |
| 9 |
> >>> What does the marked line implies? This is an outdated readme? |
| 10 |
> >> It's a QA message stating that the ebuild should be updated |
| 11 |
> >> to use a newer eclass. The readme.gentoo eclass is used |
| 12 |
> >> to generate messages specific to installing the package on Gentoo. |
| 13 |
> >> IMO ebuild QA messages like this should not be shown to users. |
| 14 |
> > The idea is that users should ping developers |
| 15 |
> > with appropriate bug reports. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> However are users supposed to know that ? |
| 18 |
> How would they know whether such a bug report really was "appropriate" ? |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> Really, Portage output needs a serious re-think (smile). |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
If emerge outputs something strange for ebuild, this should be |
| 23 |
reported as bug, as well as any other weird package behaviour. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Of course, no one _must_ report this, this is a matter of a good |
| 26 |
will. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
Best regards, |
| 29 |
Andrew Savchenko |
Archives