1 |
>> A while back I was having networking issues. I eventually tried |
2 |
>> drastically lowering the MTU of all the systems onsite and the issues |
3 |
>> disappeared. I always thought the issue was due to the MTU on our |
4 |
>> modem/router. Today I read that AT&T DSL requires a 1492 MTU so I |
5 |
>> increased the MTU of our systems up to 1492 and haven't had any |
6 |
>> issues. Do certain ISPs require you to change the MTU of your entire |
7 |
>> network, or is this likely due to our AT&T modem/router itself? |
8 |
> |
9 |
> AFAIK the MTU is defined for every network interface separately. For an |
10 |
> ADSL connection it is common that a lower MTU is needed because of the |
11 |
> PPPoE header information that is encapsulated in the ethernet frames. |
12 |
> But in that case it is sufficient to lower the MTU just for the WAN |
13 |
> interface that is connected to the DSL modem. |
14 |
> If you don't use protocol encapsulation in your LAN then there should |
15 |
> be IMHO no reason for lowering the MTU of your internal interfaces. |
16 |
|
17 |
|
18 |
So I should be OK with 1492 MTU on the modem/router and 1500 inside |
19 |
that LAN? That hasn't been my experience but I haven't tried in a |
20 |
while. Wouldn't that lead to fragmentation issues? Admittedly, my |
21 |
understanding of this is weak. |
22 |
|
23 |
- Grant |