Re: [gentoo-user] Qt5 - should I worry?

[Peter Humphrey]

On Sunday 03 January 2016 14:49:10 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sun, 03 Jan 2016 11:44:37 +0000, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > > I meant the size of the file.
> >
> > And now I want to add that using 1.5 x the space to represent far less
> > information is a clear indicator of inefficiency.
>
> Efficiency is not everything, readability is often more important.

Yes, of course I know that, and the readability I've developed with KMail-2 
in KDE-4 suits me nicely. I don't see any of the busyness that QT-5 
advocates decry, but I do see swathes of wasted space in the same program in 
KDE-5. And I do mean *wasted* - it achieves nothing at all on a desktop 
screen and would be better used for something.

Maybe the nice people at kde.org will let us have a better theme for 
desktops in due course.

-- 
Rgds
Peter