1 |
Hi, |
2 |
On Tuesday 21 February 2006 18:47, Dave Nebinger wrote: |
3 |
> Francesco Riosa wrote: |
4 |
> >> How about removing line 24? Or couldn't you think of that on your own? |
5 |
> > |
6 |
> > and you could not think that this kind of answer is _wrong_ under every |
7 |
> > corner you could look at it ? |
8 |
> |
9 |
> How about because that is set from the default installation and that 95% |
10 |
> of the folks on this list couldn't even tell you what it is for and when |
11 |
> it is appropriate to change the setting? |
12 |
> |
13 |
> How about the high probability that this person is not running their own |
14 |
> DNS and is using /etc/hosts for local name resolution? |
15 |
> |
16 |
> Or how about the fact that glibc 2.3.6-r3 (as 2.3.6 in general) is |
17 |
> masked in Portage indicating that you should expect problems if you're |
18 |
> going to build your box on an unstable version of glibc? |
19 |
> |
20 |
Please don't scare me, it's in testing (not masked). At least 2.3.6-r2|3. |
21 |
->*2.3.6 *2.3.6-r1 ~2.3.6-r2 ~2.3.6-r3 |
22 |
...SKIP... |
23 |
Rumen |