| 1 |
On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 03:34:25PM -0400, Eric S. Johansson wrote: |
| 2 |
> Renat Golubchyk wrote: |
| 3 |
> >On Mon, 24 Oct 2005 15:06:26 -0400 "Eric S. Johansson" <esj@××××××.org> |
| 4 |
> >wrote: |
| 5 |
> >>The problem was /etc/init.d/net.eth0 and /etc/init.d/net.lo were the |
| 6 |
> >>same. The net.eth0 code was overwritten with the lo code. |
| 7 |
> >> |
| 8 |
> >>This happened on two machines and I'm wondering how it happened? Did |
| 9 |
> >>something go wrong in the emerge process? There's no sign of any |
| 10 |
> >>attackers. |
| 11 |
> > |
| 12 |
> >They are always the same since net.eth0 (and all other net.<interface>) |
| 13 |
> >is a symlink to net.lo. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> then that's what broke. net.lo looks like it should and my net.eth0 |
| 16 |
> looks like: |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Is net.eth0 a symlink to net.lo? If not, remove net.eth0 and symlink |
| 20 |
it to net.lo. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
If net.eth0 is already a symlink, then something is seriously wrong, |
| 23 |
since the file you just showed us was definitely not the 2005.1 one. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
W |
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
AlexMc: Physics? Physics is EZ.. |
| 28 |
M: The Langrangian is self evident. |
| 29 |
AlexMc: Well... not that easy. |
| 30 |
Sortir en Pantoufles: up 2 days, 12:37 |
| 31 |
-- |
| 32 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives