| 1 |
Hi, Alex. |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 11:12:08AM +0200, Alex Schuster wrote: |
| 4 |
> Alan Mackenzie writes: |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
> > > Same here on ~amd64. The last change is that cups is mandatory now, |
| 7 |
> > > so the cups USE flag has been removed. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
> > What??? I run lprng on my machine, not cups. Does that mean that |
| 10 |
> > libreoffice will be broken the next time I update? Please tell me |
| 11 |
> > I've misunderstood what you've just said. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
> I don't know much about this, I just did a |
| 14 |
> diff /var/db/pkg/app-office/libreoffice-3.4.3.2-r1/libreoffice-3.4.3.2-r1.ebuild /usr/portage/app-office/libreoffice/libreoffice-3.4.3.2-r1.ebuild. |
| 15 |
> The IUSE line no longer has cups, the dependency of net-print/cups is |
| 16 |
> mandatory, and --enable-cups is always given as configure option. Yes, |
| 17 |
> this means you will need cups. I don't know if you somehow could still |
| 18 |
> print when it is not configured. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
I've had a google about this thing. gentoo-user seems about the only |
| 21 |
place this issue is discussed. Is this imposition of cups being done by |
| 22 |
LibreOffice or by our own Gentoo Projektbetreuer? |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
BTW, does anybody know a good office suite that runs on standard |
| 25 |
GNU/LINUX infrastructural assumptions? |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
> Wonko |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
-- |
| 30 |
Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany). |
Archives