1 |
On Jan 11, 2008 8:44 AM, kashani <kashani-list@××××××××.net> wrote: |
2 |
> Holla wrote: |
3 |
> > 192.168.1.1 |
4 |
> > +-+ +------------+ |
5 |
> > | |-----------| Router1 |=========ASDL conn |
6 |
> > | | +------------+ |
7 |
> > | | |
8 |
> > | | |
9 |
> > | | |
10 |
> > | | 192.168.1.23 +-------+ 192.168.2.43 |
11 |
> > | |------------------| PC1 |----)))............. |
12 |
> > +-+ +-------+ . |
13 |
> > . |
14 |
> > Passive Hub . |
15 |
> > 192.168.2.1 . |
16 |
> > +------------+ . |
17 |
> > | Router2 |--))).. |
18 |
> > +------------+ |
19 |
> > | |
20 |
> > | |
21 |
> > +------+ |
22 |
> > | PC2 | |
23 |
> > +------+ |
24 |
> > 192.168.2.24 |
25 |
> |
26 |
> Yep it's a routing problem. |
27 |
> |
28 |
> Router1 needs a route to point back to PC2 so when traffic bound for it |
29 |
> comes it, it'll know what to do with it. |
30 |
> route add -net 192.168.2.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 gw 192.168.1.23 |
31 |
> |
32 |
|
33 |
Thanks, I added this route at the Router1 and now can ping 192.168.1.1 |
34 |
at PC2. But still can't ping DNS server from PC2. |
35 |
|
36 |
At PC2 |
37 |
# traceroute 218.248.240.46 (ISP's DNS server) |
38 |
traceroute to 218.248.240.46 (218.248.240.46), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets |
39 |
1 192.168.2.43 (192.168.2.43) 1.730 ms 0.840 ms 0.920 ms |
40 |
2 192.168.1.1 (192.168.1.1) 1.440 ms 1.469 ms 1.287 ms |
41 |
3 * * * |
42 |
4 * * * |
43 |
|
44 |
At PC1 |
45 |
|
46 |
# traceroute 218.248.240.46 |
47 |
traceroute to 218.248.240.46 (218.248.240.46), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets |
48 |
1 192.168.1.1 (192.168.1.1) 0.848 ms 0.706 ms 0.681 ms |
49 |
2 117.192.128.1 (117.192.128.1) 19.712 ms 18.878 ms 19.920 ms |
50 |
3 218.248.160.134 (218.248.160.134) 19.292 ms 19.796 ms 19.190 ms |
51 |
|
52 |
|
53 |
Any idea why this is so ? |
54 |
|
55 |
sathish |
56 |
|
57 |
> kashani |
58 |
> |
59 |
> -- |
60 |
> gentoo-user@l.g.o mailing list |
61 |
> |
62 |
> |
63 |
-- |
64 |
gentoo-user@l.g.o mailing list |