| 1 |
On Tue, 25 Dec 2012 07:09:49 +0800 |
| 2 |
William Kenworthy <billk@×××××××××.au> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> Not all the proposed changes are bad ... a read only /usr would be |
| 5 |
> nice, but I object to being forced into what I regard as an unreliable |
| 6 |
> configuration (or use unreliable, crappy software, eg pulse audio!) |
| 7 |
> because of these changes - and for those who say I have a choice ... |
| 8 |
> thats correct, my choice will be eudev. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
A read only /usr is perfectly possible in any case too, especially if |
| 11 |
you choose to do things more correctly like avoiding dhcp and as a |
| 12 |
bonus it's various security issues of the past. |
Archives