| 1 |
*glxgears is not a benchmark. |
| 2 |
http://wiki.cchtml.com/index.php/Glxgears_is_not_a_Benchmark |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
I've heard that this http://www.phoronix-test-suite.com/?k=downloads is a |
| 5 |
good option*, but I still didn't have time to try it. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
2012/6/20 Walter Dnes <waltdnes@××××××××.org> |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 07:04:13AM -0700, walt wrote |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> > I just did the same update. I thought at first everything was okay, |
| 13 |
> > then I ran glxgears, which runs at 1/5 normal speed. Going back to |
| 14 |
> > 295.59 fixed it. Very puzzling, since there was nothing unusual in |
| 15 |
> > Xorg.0.log. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> What does glxgears prove anyways? With 295.59 I get 5300 fps, and |
| 18 |
> 302.17 gives me 3 spf (yes... seconds per frame!!!). But Youtube, etc |
| 19 |
> seems to function the same. So I'm wondering about the point of |
| 20 |
> glxgears. |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> -- |
| 23 |
> Walter Dnes <waltdnes@××××××××.org> |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
João de Matos |
| 30 |
Linux User #461527 |
| 31 |
Graduando em Engenharia de Computação |
| 32 |
UEFS - Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana |
Archives