| 1 |
On 21:42 Tue 25 Mar , Sergey Kobzar wrote: |
| 2 |
> >> That's one of the reason why I wanted intelfb, but got no luck. I'm |
| 3 |
> >> using uvesafb at the moment, but still hope intelfb will be fixed |
| 4 |
> >> soon. |
| 5 |
> >> |
| 6 |
> > I seem to have missed the start of this thread, but if you don't mind, |
| 7 |
> > could you give me a quick idea on what is broken within intelfb? I've |
| 8 |
> > been debating on switching to it, but keep seeing info on it being |
| 9 |
> > broken, and nothing on WHAT is broken. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> I see screen with many scrolling white lines (probably this are kernel |
| 12 |
> messages). It looks like problem with synchronization or unsupported |
| 13 |
> video mode. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> uvesafb works nice. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> -- |
| 18 |
> Sergey |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> -- |
| 21 |
> gentoo-user@l.g.o mailing list |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
uvesafb works, but it is a bit slow, and requires user-space programs to |
| 26 |
run. Its a great peice of code and such, but something that is |
| 27 |
kernel-space and able to use hardware effectivly would be even nicer. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
-- |
| 30 |
gentoo-user@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives