| 1 |
Alan Mackenzie: |
| 2 |
> So that |
| 3 |
> instead of conceptualising a "branch" (as you would do with Mercurial, |
| 4 |
> Bazaar, Subversion, or even CVS), you need to think about "commits |
| 5 |
> reachable from a certain head (excluding commits reachable from some |
| 6 |
> other head)". |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
[snipping everything that is not technical] |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
How exactly is that a disadvantage? You are just complaining about the |
| 11 |
way a concept is presented without saying what actual limitations that |
| 12 |
implies (if any). |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
If you like mercurial better, use that. Speaking about "disadvantages" |
| 15 |
however requires a bit more than "I like that way better". |
Archives