Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: David W Noon <dwnoon@××××××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] LVM filter question
Date: Sat, 02 Jul 2011 13:06:37
Message-Id: 20110702140506.675c4b5f@memphis.local
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] LVM filter question by Alex Schuster
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 On Sat, 02 Jul 2011 14:19:08 +0200, Alex Schuster wrote about "Re:
5 [gentoo-user] LVM filter question":
6
7 >David W Noon writes:
8 [snip]
9 >> So, your r.e. should read:
10 >>
11 >> r|/dev/sdd.*|
12 >>
13 >> which decodes to "reject ^/dev/sdd.*$ ".
14 >>
15 >> This suppresses the scans of /dev/sdd1, /dev/sdd2, etc.
16 >>
17 >> Now, you might not have any partitions on /dev/sdd, but LVM cannot
18 >> readily know that without reading the partition table, which spins up
19 >> the drive. I guess LVM doesn't trust or, at least, depend upon udev
20 >> to supply the partition details.
21 >
22 >Good idea, didn't think about this. I tried that, but it did not help.
23 >/dev/sdd indeed has no partitions, the whole drive is a LUKS container.
24
25 My best suggestion is to create a maximal primary partition as /dev/sdd1
26 and use that as your LUKS volume. That way, LVM will receive the
27 partition details from udev and *might* not bother re-reading the
28 partition table (but don't bet big bucks on it).
29 - --
30 Regards,
31
32 Dave [RLU #314465]
33 ======================================================================
34 dwnoon@××××××××.com (David W Noon)
35 ======================================================================
36 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
37 Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux)
38
39 iEYEARECAAYFAk4PF4oACgkQRQ2Fs59Psv/rLQCffhO28wgWhz/zE+FYwkgRlOfO
40 8xEAoJvn8soQYrXjiuyRxb5ue+rwUuTt
41 =691b
42 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] LVM filter question Alex Schuster <wonko@×××××××××.org>