Archives
Archives
| From: | Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@×××××.de> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | [gentoo-user] Re: Best way to improve interactivity with heavy disk activity? | ||
| Date: | Sun, 28 Nov 2010 00:14:30 | ||
| Message-Id: | ics6qb$v99$1@dough.gmane.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Best way to improve interactivity with heavy disk activity? by Stroller |
||
| 1 | On 11/28/2010 01:03 AM, Stroller wrote: |
| 2 | > |
| 3 | > On 27/11/2010, at 10:22pm, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: |
| 4 | >> |
| 5 | >> The ck patch set does not support group scheduling anyway; |
| 6 | > |
| 7 | > Now I'm a little more confused. Does `ionice` need the CFQ scheduler? |
| 8 | |
| 9 | Nope. I/O scheduling priorities are part of the I/O scheduler, not the |
| 10 | CPU scheduler. |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Best way to improve interactivity with heavy disk activity? | App Deb <appdebgr@×××××.com> |