| 1 |
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 1:24 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann |
| 2 |
<volkerarmin@××××××××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
> On Freitag 15 Mai 2009, pk wrote: |
| 4 |
>> Alan McKinnon wrote: |
| 5 |
>> > DeviceKit isn't even in portage yet and not many packages support it. I |
| 6 |
>> > don't even know if the devs will change and improve the configs much, if |
| 7 |
>> > at all. The problem with hal is that it's code base is a mess, and it's |
| 8 |
>> > design is a mish- mash of stuff throwwn together. At least, that's what |
| 9 |
>> > the lead hal dev says |
| 10 |
>> |
| 11 |
>> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DeviceKit#Dependencies |
| 12 |
>> |
| 13 |
>> I haven't looked into this in any depth but it seems like Devicekit will |
| 14 |
>> not be an improvement (looks like it brings in the "kitchen sink" in |
| 15 |
>> dependencies - I'm also "allergic" to gnome)... |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> in my opinion a 'solution' that is based on the worst desktop (gnome) is the |
| 18 |
> worst possible 'solution'. What about kde users? what about xfce? fluxbox? |
| 19 |
> enlightenment users? |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> Fedora screws everybody over. Like always. |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Now that seems a bit strong. Presumably they aren't screwing over |
| 25 |
Fedora 11 Gnome users. (Draw Venn diagram now to look for small |
| 26 |
portion...) |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
I don't disagree with you but it would seem that they have to start somewhere... |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
Cheers, |
| 31 |
Mark |
Archives