1 |
On Fri, 13 Nov 2020 18:59:24 -0500, Jude DaShiell wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> Thanks for the decode, I hope I'll get better at understanding this kind |
4 |
> of error output in future. |
5 |
|
6 |
You will, it takes a while to learn to speak portagese :) |
7 |
|
8 |
> On Fri, 13 Nov 2020, Neil Bothwick wrote: |
9 |
> |
10 |
> > Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2020 18:28:32 |
11 |
> > From: Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> |
12 |
> > Reply-To: gentoo-user@l.g.o |
13 |
> > To: gentoo-user@l.g.o |
14 |
> > Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] systemd install attempt busybox and pam are |
15 |
> > fighting |
16 |
> > |
17 |
> > On Fri, 13 Nov 2020 17:40:43 -0500, Jude DaShiell wrote: |
18 |
> > |
19 |
> > > !!! The ebuild selected to satisfy "sys-apps/busybox" has unmet |
20 |
> > > requirements. |
21 |
> > > - sys-apps/busybox-1.32.0-r1::gentoo USE="ipv6 pam static systemd |
22 |
> > > -debug -livecd -make-symlinks -math -mdev -savedconfig (-selinux) |
23 |
> > > -sep-usr -syslog" ABI_X86="(64)" |
24 |
> > > |
25 |
> > > The following REQUIRED_USE flag constraints are unsatisfied: |
26 |
> > > pam? ( !static ) |
27 |
> > |
28 |
> > It means that if you have the pam USE flag set, the static flag must |
29 |
> > be unset. You can have one or the other, or neither, but not both. |
30 |
> > |
31 |
> > |
32 |
> > |
33 |
> |
34 |
|
35 |
|
36 |
|
37 |
|
38 |
-- |
39 |
Neil Bothwick |
40 |
|
41 |
If a deaf person swears, does his mother wash his hands with soap? |