| 1 |
On Thursday 22 June 2006 22:47, Benno Schulenberg wrote: |
| 2 |
> Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote: |
| 3 |
> > Hence you may run into this problem for a lot of packages that |
| 4 |
> > belong to modular X as they are upgraded to newer versions that |
| 5 |
> > your /etc/portage/package.keywords doesn't unmask. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> Hmm... Does package.keywords allow to keyword specific versions of |
| 8 |
> a package? Not here. When trying it, it says: --- Invalid atom |
| 9 |
> in /etc/portage/package.keywords. (Portage-2.1-r1.) |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Then I have no explanation for what happened so you can just disregard the |
| 12 |
above statement. And yes does allow it. Whether it is a good idea is a |
| 13 |
different question. I already gave you a link to the handbook. This |
| 14 |
particular feature is covered in part 3, chapter 3. It's also covered in `man |
| 15 |
portage`. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
[1] http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/handbook/handbook-x86.xml?part=3&chap=3 |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
Bo Andresen |
Archives