| 1 |
On Sunday 03 January 2016 11:08:32 I wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Saturday 02 January 2016 12:45:09 Frank Steinmetzger wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 01:23:28PM +0000, Peter Humphrey wrote: |
| 4 |
> > > > > you see here. And the qt5 screen shot is half as big again as the |
| 5 |
> > > > > qt4. |
| 6 |
> > > > |
| 7 |
> > > > I don't quite get that. |
| 8 |
> > > |
| 9 |
> > > ?? |
| 10 |
> > |
| 11 |
> > Both images are the same size. The usable content area in the qt5 |
| 12 |
> > screenshot is far from just half. Maybe the word “again” tips me off b/c |
| 13 |
> > I try to interpret a meaning into every word, being a pedantic |
| 14 |
> > non-native. ;-) |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> I meant the size of the file. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
And now I want to add that using 1.5 x the space to represent far less |
| 19 |
information is a clear indicator of inefficiency. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
Rgds |
| 23 |
Peter |
Archives