Archives
Archives
| From: | Peter Humphrey <peter@××××××××××××××.org> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] which filesystem is more suitable for /var/tmp/portage? | ||
| Date: | Wed, 18 Sep 2013 14:05:23 | ||
| Message-Id: | 4083700.7YOtJyrB1G@wstn | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] which filesystem is more suitable for /var/tmp/portage? by Ralf Ramsauer |
||
| 1 | On Wednesday 18 Sep 2013 14:52:30 Ralf Ramsauer wrote: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | > In my opinion, reiser is a bit outdated ... |
| 4 | |
| 5 | What is the significance of its date? I use reiserfs on my Atom box for /var, |
| 6 | /var/cache/squid and /usr/portage, and on my workstation for /usr/portage and |
| 7 | /home/prh/.VirtualBox. It's never given me any trouble at all. |
| 8 | |
| 9 | Perhaps you meant that, say, ext4 has better all-round performance? |
| 10 | |
| 11 | -- |
| 12 | Regards, |
| 13 | Peter |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-user] which filesystem is more suitable for /var/tmp/portage? | Ralf Ramsauer <ralf+gentoo@×××××××××××××××××××.de> |
| Re: [gentoo-user] which filesystem is more suitable for /var/tmp/portage? | Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> |