1 |
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 10:07 PM, Adam Carter <Adam.Carter@×××××××××.au> wrote: |
2 |
>> >> For me, |
3 |
>> >> libdri.so is a symlink to |
4 |
>> /usr/lib64/opengl/ati/extensions/libdri.so |
5 |
>> >> libglx.so is a symlink to |
6 |
>> /usr/lib64/opengl/ati/extensions/libglx.so (since you havent |
7 |
>> run the eselect to repoint it yet, it will be set to |
8 |
>> /usr/lib64/opengl/xorg-x11/extensions/libglx.so). |
9 |
>> >> |
10 |
>> |
11 |
>> Can you tell me what package owns those files? I'm not having any |
12 |
>> luck looking them up on my system. |
13 |
> |
14 |
> Sorry Kevin, I wasn't paying attention and thought you were using ati-drivers/flgrx package, which is where /usr/lib64/opengl/ati comes from. Since you're not using flgrx I would expect you would use /usr/lib/xorg/modules/extensions/libdri.so and /usr/lib/xorg/modules/extensions/libdri.so. |
15 |
> |
16 |
> Do those files exist? |
17 |
> |
18 |
> |
19 |
|
20 |
The two filenames you give appear identical. The directory contains |
21 |
two broken symlinks and some files: |
22 |
|
23 |
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 17836 2009-05-25 09:04 libdbe.so |
24 |
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 47 2009-05-25 09:15 libdri.so -> |
25 |
//usr//lib/opengl/xorg-x11/extensions/libdri.so |
26 |
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 125416 2009-05-25 09:04 libextmod.so |
27 |
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 47 2009-05-25 09:15 libglx.so -> |
28 |
//usr//lib/opengl/xorg-x11/extensions/libglx.so |
29 |
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 26024 2009-05-25 09:04 librecord.so |
30 |
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 36428 2009-05-25 09:04 libxtrap.so |
31 |
drwxrwxrwt 2 root root 4096 2009-05-25 11:10 tmp |
32 |
drwxr-xr-x 5 root root 4096 2009-05-25 11:10 var |
33 |
|
34 |
The directory those symlinks point to is empty. |
35 |
|
36 |
-- |
37 |
Kevin O'Gorman, PhD |