1 |
Then the idea that the Gentoo Foundation might 'cease to exist as an |
2 |
entity' isn't really bad news? |
3 |
|
4 |
Some clarification might be in order. |
5 |
|
6 |
On 7/27/07, Volker Armin Hemmann <volker.armin.hemmann@××××××××××××.de> wrote: |
7 |
> On Freitag, 27. Juli 2007, Daniel da Veiga wrote: |
8 |
> > http://www.osnews.com/story.php/18315/The-Future-of-the-Gentoo-Foundation |
9 |
> |
10 |
> this is only a (small) part of what Mr Robbins wrote. |
11 |
> |
12 |
> here is the complete blog-post: |
13 |
> http://blog.funtoo.org/ |
14 |
> |
15 |
> > |
16 |
> > A friend provided me this link, and I'm a little worried... Is this |
17 |
> > truth, and if it is, how is this problem being solved? |
18 |
> |
19 |
> well, it is true, that there are problems with paperworks. |
20 |
> |
21 |
> > |
22 |
> > I guess this is the right place to ask, as all of us users should be |
23 |
> > concerned about this... |
24 |
> |
25 |
> maybe. But I can't see why we users should be concerned. It does not matter |
26 |
> for us if gentoo stays 'independent' or not. |
27 |
> -- |
28 |
> gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
29 |
> |
30 |
> |
31 |
|
32 |
|
33 |
-- |
34 |
-·=»Ãŧħ«=·- |
35 |
éí¢‹¬z¸žÚ(¢¸&j)bž b² |