| 1 |
Am 31.07.2014 05:50, schrieb Alec Ten Harmsel: |
| 2 |
>> okular is not a 'stinking pdf reader'. Nice try. But just like konqueror |
| 3 |
>> it is just a wrapper around kparts and is able to deal with a lot more |
| 4 |
>> files than just pdf and postscript. |
| 5 |
>> |
| 6 |
>> That is what 'modular' and 'code reuse' really means. |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
>> And the opposite to what gnome does. 'oh, there is an app. Hijack it and |
| 9 |
>> gnomify it and make it dependent on 2 douzend gnome libs that all do the |
| 10 |
>> same but nobody ever cleaned up'. |
| 11 |
> You're right about the code reuse if you're running KDE, but I'd rather |
| 12 |
> not install *all* of Qt and a bunch of other crap just to view PDFs and |
| 13 |
> such. I think that's all he's arguing. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
well, do you complain if you have to install *all* of gtk + gnome |
| 16 |
objects+introspection+gconf? |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> I love having KDE on my desktop (and okular is really nice), but on my |
| 19 |
> laptop (i3wm) I spend the vast majority of my time in vim and on the |
| 20 |
> terminal and shouldn't have to essentially install KDE to view a PDF |
| 21 |
> when I need to check some LaTeX formatting. Just contrast with evince; I |
| 22 |
> disabled nautilus integration, and my machine only has 5 gnome packages, |
| 23 |
> 2 of which are icon sets. |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> Alec |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> . |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
how much do you have to install if you deactivate all use flags for |
| 31 |
okular? well, you still have all of qt... and kdelibs and phonon... but |
| 32 |
you would loose a lot of the other stuff. vlc support in phonon is as |
| 33 |
optional as tiff or chm in okular. |
Archives