Archives
Archives
| From: | Heiko Baums <lists@××××××××××××.de> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] from Firefox52: NO pure ALSA?, WAS: Firefox 49.0 & Youtube... Audio: No | ||
| Date: | Tue, 20 Dec 2016 16:22:34 | ||
| Message-Id: | 3bf0f4ef-79d1-401b-cdd3-948c13f12f2a@baums-on-web.de | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] from Firefox52: NO pure ALSA?, WAS: Firefox 49.0 & Youtube... Audio: No by Andrej Rode |
||
| 1 | Am 20.12.2016 um 05:23 schrieb Andrej Rode: |
| 2 | > Yeah they make life easier. From your talk you never had a problem with |
| 3 | > eth<0,10> switching names after boot. Everyone who had them appreciates |
| 4 | > predictable network interfaces. |
| 5 | |
| 6 | Everyone who had them could learn how to write simple udev rules to get |
| 7 | fixed eth<0,10> names after every boot. No systemd and no "predictable" |
| 8 | names necessary. |
| 9 | |
| 10 | Nevertheless I'm still wondering what's so predictable at those |
| 11 | incomprehensible, cryptic device names anyway. And I don't want to know |
| 12 | that. |
| 13 | |
| 14 | Heiko Baums |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-user] from Firefox52: NO pure ALSA?, WAS: Firefox 49.0 & Youtube... Audio: No | Kai Peter <kp@×××××××××××××××.org> |
| Re: [gentoo-user] from Firefox52: NO pure ALSA?, WAS: Firefox 49.0 & Youtube... Audio: No | Tom H <tomh0665@×××××.com> |