| 1 |
On 2018-03-25 13:50, Neil Bothwick wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> The only hard block here appears to be xscrnsaverproto, unmerge that and |
| 4 |
> the rest should take care of themselves. I had all the soft blocks today |
| 5 |
> but not that one, and everything worked fine. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
But ... I actually have packages that depend on scrnsaverproto: |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
matica!524 ~# equery d scrnsaverproto |
| 10 |
* These packages depend on scrnsaverproto: |
| 11 |
x11-base/xorg-server-1.19.5-r1 (>=x11-proto/scrnsaverproto-1.1) |
| 12 |
x11-libs/libXScrnSaver-1.2.2-r1 (>=x11-proto/scrnsaverproto-1.2.2-r1[abi_x86_32(-)?,abi_x86_64(-)?,abi_x86_x32(-)?,abi_mips_n32(-)?,abi_mips_n64(-)?,abi_mips_o32(-)?,abi_ppc_32(-)?,abi_ppc_64(-)?,abi_s390_32(-)?,abi_s390_64(-)?]) |
| 13 |
x11-misc/xautolock-2.2_p5_p1 (x11-proto/scrnsaverproto) |
| 14 |
x11-misc/xssstate-1.1 (x11-proto/scrnsaverproto) |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
So I have to unmerge xautolock and xssstate too? That will be painful |
| 17 |
because they're baked deep into my X configuration. I think it will |
| 18 |
require a trip to the Linux console :-P |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
Please don't Cc: me privately on mailing lists and Usenet, |
| 22 |
if you also post the followup to the list or newsgroup. |
| 23 |
To reply privately _only_ on Usenet and on broken lists |
| 24 |
which rewrite From, fetch the TXT record for no-use.mooo.com. |
Archives