| 1 |
walt wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Tue, 26 Apr 2016 18:50:41 -0500 |
| 3 |
> Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
>> Dale wrote: |
| 6 |
>>> Howdy, |
| 7 |
>>> |
| 8 |
>>> Doing some updates and ran into this. Anyone else having this |
| 9 |
>>> problem? I can post more info if needed but thought this would get |
| 10 |
>>> it off to a start. |
| 11 |
>>> |
| 12 |
>>> |
| 13 |
>>> |
| 14 |
>>> <<< SNIP >>> |
| 15 |
>>> |
| 16 |
>>> Anyone else running into this? Anything obvious sticking out? |
| 17 |
>>> |
| 18 |
>>> Thanks. |
| 19 |
>>> |
| 20 |
>>> Dale |
| 21 |
>>> |
| 22 |
>>> :-) :-) |
| 23 |
>>> |
| 24 |
>>> |
| 25 |
>> |
| 26 |
>> I synced again and was hoping I either caught the tree in the middle |
| 27 |
>> of some change over with the last sync or whatever it is would have a |
| 28 |
>> fix by now. Well, still the same error as before. |
| 29 |
> I'm still on my gcc-5 vs gcc-4 bandwagon. And what's that thingy that |
| 30 |
> stands for 'thread too long, didn't read'? |
| 31 |
> |
| 32 |
> |
| 33 |
> |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
TL;DR I think that's it. |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
Dale |
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
:-) :-) |
Archives