| 1 |
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 4:36 AM, Dirk Heinrichs <dirk.heinrichs@××××××.de>wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> Am Sonntag 13 September 2009 13:04:37 schrieb Arttu V.: |
| 4 |
> > On 9/13/09, Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@×××××.de> wrote: |
| 5 |
> > > On 09/13/2009 01:48 PM, Kevin O'Gorman wrote: |
| 6 |
> > >> On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 3:42 AM, Kevin O'Gorman <kogorman@×××××.com |
| 7 |
> > >> <mailto:kogorman@×××××.com>> wrote: |
| 8 |
> > >> Umm. I just looked at the .config files, and it appears the |
| 9 |
> interfaces |
| 10 |
> > >> are supported by the config option CONFIG_EEPRO100=y |
| 11 |
> > >> which is not even present in the 2.6.30 file. Eeeek! Is my system now |
| 12 |
> > >> unsupportable? |
| 13 |
> > > |
| 14 |
> > > It's CONFIG_E100: |
| 15 |
> > > |
| 16 |
> > Yes, a different(?) driver is to be used apparently (code duplication |
| 17 |
> > reductions?): |
| 18 |
> > |
| 19 |
> > "e100: add support for 82552 10/100 adapter" |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> Yep. It's these kind of changes that make me go through make menuconfig |
| 22 |
> once |
| 23 |
> after major version upgrades. |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> BTW: There's no need for "make oldconfig" in this case. |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> Maybe things have changed since the dark ages when I started using Gentoo. |
| 28 |
Back then, occasional mayhem would ensue if you tried using an old .config. |
| 29 |
Sometimes. So I'm keeping this habit -- it also gives me a heads-up about |
| 30 |
new features. |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
> Bye... |
| 34 |
> |
| 35 |
> Dirk |
| 36 |
> |
| 37 |
> |
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
-- |
| 41 |
Kevin O'Gorman, PhD |
Archives