1 |
On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 02:05:41 +0100, Alex Schuster wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> > But if you set m > 0, the filesystem will become full sooner, so |
4 |
> > fragmentation will begin sooner (for non-root processes). |
5 |
> |
6 |
> Uh, really? I wouldn't think so. With m > 0, there is much space left, |
7 |
> in large contiguous chunks, even though the user cannot use it all. But |
8 |
> there should be no difference between writing files in terms of |
9 |
> fragmentation. The reserved stuff acts just like a quota, at least |
10 |
> that's what I always thought. |
11 |
|
12 |
Yeah, that makes sense, so why should the reserved setting affect |
13 |
fragmentation at all, unless you write so much data that the filesystem |
14 |
would be full with a larger m? In that case, I'd prefer fragmentation to |
15 |
a failed write. |
16 |
|
17 |
|
18 |
-- |
19 |
Neil Bothwick |
20 |
|
21 |
Don't just do something, sit there! |