Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] gcc update failed...
Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2009 18:05:18
Message-Id: 4A523CD8.7020408@gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] gcc update failed... by Volker Armin Hemmann
1 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
2 > On Montag 06 Juli 2009, Jarry wrote:
3 >
4 >> Hi,
5 >> I just tried to update gcc (actually, it is just recompiling with
6 >> new nptl flag), but it failed with this messages:
7 >> __________
8 >>
9 >> >>> Failed to emerge sys-devel/gcc-4.3.2-r3, Log file:
10 >> >>>
11 >> >>> '/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-4.3.2-r3/temp/build.log'
12 >>
13 >> * Messages for package sys-devel/gcc-4.3.2-r3:
14 >>
15 >> *
16 >> * ERROR: sys-devel/gcc-4.3.2-r3 failed.
17 >> * Call stack:
18 >> * ebuild.sh, line 49: Called src_compile
19 >> * environment, line 4870: Called toolchain_src_compile
20 >> * environment, line 5396: Called gcc_src_compile
21 >> * environment, line 3094: Called gcc_do_make
22 >> * environment, line 2884: Called die
23 >> * The specific snippet of code:
24 >> * emake LDFLAGS="${LDFLAGS}" STAGE1_CFLAGS="${STAGE1_CFLAGS}"
25 >> LIBPATH="${
26 >> LIBPATH}" BOOT_CFLAGS="${BOOT_CFLAGS}"
27 >> ${GCC_MAKE_TARGET} || die "emake failed with ${GCC_MAKE_TARGET}";
28 >> * The die message:
29 >> * emake failed with bootstrap-lean
30 >> *
31 >> * If you need support, post the topmost build error, and the call
32 >> stack if relevant.
33 >> * A complete build log is located at
34 >> '/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-4.3.2-r3/temp/build.log'.
35 >> * The ebuild environment file is located at
36 >> '/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-4.3.2-r3/temp/environment'.
37 >> __________
38 >>
39 >> What does it mean, and how can I fix it???
40 >>
41 >> Jarry
42 >>
43 >
44 > that means that you forgot to copy the important part. You just copied the
45 > pretty useless vanilla portage error. Not the real error some lines above that
46 > one.
47 >
48 >
49 >
50
51 And based on a little searching, you may want to post emerge --info as
52 well. There appears to be a version of kernel that doesn't like this
53 gcc version. Note the word "appears".
54
55 Dale
56
57 :-) :-)