Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Dale <dalek1967@×××××××××.net>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Boot Gentoo to clean windows
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 22:40:15
Message-Id: 47EC2248.6060005@bellsouth.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Boot Gentoo to clean windows by Alan McKinnon
1 Alan McKinnon wrote:
2 > On Thursday 27 March 2008, Dale wrote:
3 >
4 >> Florian Philipp wrote:
5 >>
6 >>> This is getting OT but I still want to ask:
7 >>> Is it really necessary to run an anti-virus on linux? I just want
8 >>> to hear some opinions on that topic because I thought security
9 >>> fixes for your software are the way to go for fighting virae on
10 >>> linux.
11 >>>
12 >> I have not ran a anti-virus here for years and no problems so far. I
13 >> don't think Linux has this problem except for the rootkit thing. It
14 >> seems Linux is just pretty much immune to this sort of thing.
15 >>
16 >
17 > Not really immune as such, just well protected. It's very hard to gain
18 > remote access as a user and then find an exploit to elevate to root
19 > priviledges. The devastation wrought on the internet by zombie windows
20 > machines is by and large not really possible on Linux to anything like
21 > the same degree - if an attacker dupes a user into running some malware
22 > it tends to run as the user which limits what the malware can do i.e.
23 > no ports open below 1024 etc etc.
24 >
25 > BUT some points to keep in mind:
26 >
27 > 1. Linux us still small fry in the desktop market, and not really a
28 > target for malware scumbags. Why should they? It's much harder to do
29 > especially when Redmond's finest code in the wild is such juicy low
30 > hanging fruit. This is bound to change, just a matter of time
31 >
32 > 2. There are some Linuxes out there that run everything as root.
33 > Xandros, I'm especially looking at you here. Apparently the Xandros
34 > devs like the way Redmond does things, right down to the brain dead
35 > design decisions <sigh> human stupidity is apparently boundless
36 >
37 > 3. If an attacker gains access to your machine, he can trash your
38 > personal stuff just for spite. This is catastrophic to the average user
39 > even though it leaves the rest of the internet just as it was
40 >
41 >
42
43 True, but I did say 'pretty much'. Nothing is completely immune. A old
44 Commodore Vic-20 can be hacked if you can connect it to the net.
45 Although it is not fast enough to do much harm. LOL
46
47 I also agree that as Linux grows, so will the people trying to hack
48 them. As long as there are people using Linux that don't keep there box
49 fairly secure, it will happen. I don't think it will be as easy as the
50 finest Redmond software but they will try. If nothings else, they will
51 try common passwords and there will always be some idiot with their
52 password set to love, sex, god and other easy to guess ones. I like my
53 password tho. It's numbers and letters and has no meaning whatsoever.
54 Not even a birth date in it.
55
56 I was not aware of #2. Sounds like a bunch of Redmond whatabees. o_O
57
58 Dale
59
60 :-) :-) :-)
61 --
62 gentoo-user@l.g.o mailing list