1 |
Alan McKinnon wrote: |
2 |
> On Thursday 27 March 2008, Dale wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
>> Florian Philipp wrote: |
5 |
>> |
6 |
>>> This is getting OT but I still want to ask: |
7 |
>>> Is it really necessary to run an anti-virus on linux? I just want |
8 |
>>> to hear some opinions on that topic because I thought security |
9 |
>>> fixes for your software are the way to go for fighting virae on |
10 |
>>> linux. |
11 |
>>> |
12 |
>> I have not ran a anti-virus here for years and no problems so far. I |
13 |
>> don't think Linux has this problem except for the rootkit thing. It |
14 |
>> seems Linux is just pretty much immune to this sort of thing. |
15 |
>> |
16 |
> |
17 |
> Not really immune as such, just well protected. It's very hard to gain |
18 |
> remote access as a user and then find an exploit to elevate to root |
19 |
> priviledges. The devastation wrought on the internet by zombie windows |
20 |
> machines is by and large not really possible on Linux to anything like |
21 |
> the same degree - if an attacker dupes a user into running some malware |
22 |
> it tends to run as the user which limits what the malware can do i.e. |
23 |
> no ports open below 1024 etc etc. |
24 |
> |
25 |
> BUT some points to keep in mind: |
26 |
> |
27 |
> 1. Linux us still small fry in the desktop market, and not really a |
28 |
> target for malware scumbags. Why should they? It's much harder to do |
29 |
> especially when Redmond's finest code in the wild is such juicy low |
30 |
> hanging fruit. This is bound to change, just a matter of time |
31 |
> |
32 |
> 2. There are some Linuxes out there that run everything as root. |
33 |
> Xandros, I'm especially looking at you here. Apparently the Xandros |
34 |
> devs like the way Redmond does things, right down to the brain dead |
35 |
> design decisions <sigh> human stupidity is apparently boundless |
36 |
> |
37 |
> 3. If an attacker gains access to your machine, he can trash your |
38 |
> personal stuff just for spite. This is catastrophic to the average user |
39 |
> even though it leaves the rest of the internet just as it was |
40 |
> |
41 |
> |
42 |
|
43 |
True, but I did say 'pretty much'. Nothing is completely immune. A old |
44 |
Commodore Vic-20 can be hacked if you can connect it to the net. |
45 |
Although it is not fast enough to do much harm. LOL |
46 |
|
47 |
I also agree that as Linux grows, so will the people trying to hack |
48 |
them. As long as there are people using Linux that don't keep there box |
49 |
fairly secure, it will happen. I don't think it will be as easy as the |
50 |
finest Redmond software but they will try. If nothings else, they will |
51 |
try common passwords and there will always be some idiot with their |
52 |
password set to love, sex, god and other easy to guess ones. I like my |
53 |
password tho. It's numbers and letters and has no meaning whatsoever. |
54 |
Not even a birth date in it. |
55 |
|
56 |
I was not aware of #2. Sounds like a bunch of Redmond whatabees. o_O |
57 |
|
58 |
Dale |
59 |
|
60 |
:-) :-) :-) |
61 |
-- |
62 |
gentoo-user@l.g.o mailing list |