| 1 |
Neil Bothwick wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Fri, 28 Jun 2013 21:44:34 -0500, Dale wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>>> Other comments note that unsetting "static" allows it to build. Try |
| 5 |
>>> unsetting the "static" flag for lvm2 in package.use, i.e... |
| 6 |
>>> |
| 7 |
>>> sys-fs/lvm2 -static |
| 8 |
>>> |
| 9 |
>>> Does that build for you? |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
>> It might would but I can't recall WHY I set it to that. If I set it |
| 12 |
>> that way in package.use, which is rare for me, then I had to have a good |
| 13 |
>> reason. I need to start making notes on this stuff. ;-) |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> You need static if you are using lvm in an initramfs. Whatever the |
| 16 |
> reason, if you remove it the ebuild that told you to add it in the first |
| 17 |
> place will remind you next time you update @world. |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Now that you mention it, it may have been when the separate /usr init |
| 22 |
thingy was going on that I had to add it. That could be it. Well, if I |
| 23 |
have to upgrade before they have a fix, I'll give it a shot and see what |
| 24 |
happens. I suspect it will be fixed at some point and most likely in |
| 25 |
the next update anyway. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
Dale |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
:-) :-) |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
-- |
| 32 |
I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or |
| 33 |
how you interpreted my words! |
Archives