| 1 |
On Tuesday 28 February 2006 05:30, Harry Putnam wrote: |
| 2 |
> It all cleared up after a reboot. I didn't mention I made a domain |
| 3 |
> name switch preceding the reported problem too. I suspect my |
| 4 |
> nameserver cache hadn't had time to clear up (I have pretty long Time |
| 5 |
> To Live values set). Although I really don't now if that would be an |
| 6 |
> issue. |
| 7 |
That's great! Too bad you didn't get to the bottom of it, but fixed is better |
| 8 |
than broken. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
> ip route |
| 11 |
> 192.168.1.0/24 dev eth1 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.1.2 |
| 12 |
> 192.168.0.0/24 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.0.4 |
| 13 |
> 127.0.0.0/8 dev lo scope link |
| 14 |
> default via 192.168.0.20 dev eth0 |
| 15 |
This is proper. Only one gateway and it's through the eth0 device. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
> arp -a |
| 18 |
> fw.local.lan (192.168.0.20) at 00:09:5B:01:2F:E4 [ether] on eth0 |
| 19 |
> fwobsd.local.lan (192.168.0.19) at 00:10:B5:91:85:88 [ether] on eth0 |
| 20 |
It's interesting here that you don't see anything on 192.168.1.0/24. Perhaps |
| 21 |
nothing is connected to that interface right now? |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Congrats on the problem being fixed. |
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
Zac Slade |
| 26 |
krakrjak@××××××××××.net |
| 27 |
ICQ:1415282 YM:krakrjak AIM:ttyp99 |
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives