1 |
Hi, |
2 |
|
3 |
Sorry for another tree of answers, but the others seemed a bit "fuzzy" |
4 |
to me... |
5 |
|
6 |
On Sun, 23 Oct 2005 16:08:50 +0800 (CST) |
7 |
Zhang Weiwu <zhangweiwu@××××××.com> wrote: |
8 |
|
9 |
> Because I always save two copies of every of my document, one in original |
10 |
> format (eg. odt) and another in printable format for my colleagues in case |
11 |
> they don't have the Linux fonts and software. Here comes the question should |
12 |
> I keep a PS copy or PDF copy. |
13 |
|
14 |
Note that PS is an interpreted language. PDF is a pure document format, |
15 |
no "program flow" involved there. |
16 |
|
17 |
You can do pretty funny things using Postscript you won't ever be able |
18 |
to do with PDF. I think Postscript even has a Random Generator. |
19 |
|
20 |
So if you do serious Postscript programming, PDF isn't an option ;-) |
21 |
|
22 |
PDF can be thought as the final result of a computation, Postscript |
23 |
describes the computation itself. |
24 |
|
25 |
> I think PDF copy is absolutely the prefered format because: |
26 |
> * easier to find acrobat reader; |
27 |
|
28 |
Hm. Let's turn this into: On most computers you'll find a PDF reader today. |
29 |
|
30 |
> * can be 'Tagged', especially used with OOo; |
31 |
|
32 |
Hm, produced by OOo, but "used"?!? Can be something to think of when it |
33 |
comes to reading on PDAs. |
34 |
|
35 |
> * possibility to 'copy and paste', though format will be lost; |
36 |
|
37 |
Not impossible with Postscript - doesn't have Gnome's new doc viewer |
38 |
have such a feature? Or something on KDE? Not sure, though... |
39 |
|
40 |
> * not to take other people by surprise with unfamiliar PS extension; |
41 |
|
42 |
But you still have the PDF version that _may_ prevent you from opening |
43 |
the PDFs on older Acrobat Readers when chosing a too high level. |
44 |
|
45 |
> * different quanlity: I can save PDF in very high quanlity that I was told |
46 |
> "can be taken to press house" |
47 |
|
48 |
No difference to postscript here - besides the new layers feature |
49 |
|
50 |
> * easy to convert to PS format when needed. |
51 |
|
52 |
This is true the other way, too. |
53 |
|
54 |
> Here comes the question: if the above all stands true, why do I ever need PS |
55 |
> format at all? There might be some reasons to keep this format still |
56 |
> existing. Perhaps in other areas, other then office work. |
57 |
|
58 |
Because that's what your printer interpretes? Or its network server thingy? |
59 |
|
60 |
> So the conclusion: for typical office workers, we can forget PS format. |
61 |
|
62 |
Except for piping it to the printer, yes. |
63 |
|
64 |
> Now welcome for suggestions. |
65 |
|
66 |
PDF is fine. Hm, and if you want something very future-proof, keep a |
67 |
plain text copy. This isn't a joke, let's discuss this in 30 years or |
68 |
so... |
69 |
|
70 |
> P.S. another quesiton I happen wish to have an answer: in one case, I have |
71 |
> to keep PS format because, I can print booklet (brochure) in OOO2 right the |
72 |
> way I expected, but if I carry this brochure to my colleague, and he doesn't |
73 |
> have openoffice, then I try to export to PDF format, and found there is no |
74 |
> 'brochure' option in exporting,[..... |
75 |
|
76 |
emerge pdftk && read about it on http://www.accesspdf.com, or check out |
77 |
the Multivalent Tools (google will tell you the address). |
78 |
|
79 |
> .......] also there is no 'brochure' option in |
80 |
> Acrobat Reader printing dialogue box, so it's clear if I export to PDF |
81 |
> format I will never be able to print it in brochure style on a normal PC, so |
82 |
> I have to print to PS file and carry it. But so far this is the only case I |
83 |
> think I need PS format. If I only exported PDF format, can I still print a |
84 |
> brochure? The difficulty in printing brochure is you have to make correct |
85 |
> page order. |
86 |
|
87 |
Of course. You can create a new PDF with above mentioned tools that has |
88 |
pages from the other PDF layouted in a certain way in the new PDF. |
89 |
|
90 |
-hwh |
91 |
|
92 |
-- |
93 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |