| 1 |
On 08/04/14 04:27, Michael Orlitzky wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 04/07/2014 04:08 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote: |
| 3 |
>> Extra testers requested for netifrc-0.2.2 stabilization, also, if you |
| 4 |
>> know a reason this shouldn't go stable, like |
| 5 |
>> regression from 0.1, speak up now. |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
>> See, http://bugs.gentoo.org/507070 |
| 8 |
>> |
| 9 |
>> (I'm purposely special casing this package over others like this.) |
| 10 |
> The bug says "be careful!", but what sort of trouble should we expect? |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
I don't think you should really expect anything, it's just that we have |
| 16 |
no intrested |
| 17 |
in breaking peoples networking... |
| 18 |
Personally I'm worried about users with alternative /bin/sh symlinks, |
| 19 |
pointing to something |
| 20 |
else than bash, like to dash, but that worry could be misguided too. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
- Samuli |
Archives