| 1 |
Daniel Pielmeier wrote: |
| 2 |
> 2008/8/4, Dale <dalek1967@×××××××××.net>: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>> There are three versions, all masked. Could you share which version you |
| 5 |
>> use? I ask since it works for you, then it may work for me too. ;-) |
| 6 |
>> - app-portage/udept-0.5.99.0.2.95-r1 (masked by: ~x86 |
| 7 |
>> keyword) |
| 8 |
>> - app-portage/udept-0.5.99.0.2.95 (masked by: ~x86 keyword) |
| 9 |
>> - app-portage/udept-0.5.96.2 (masked by: ~x86 keyword) |
| 10 |
>> |
| 11 |
>> |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> I suggest you to use the ebuild from bug 172611 [1]. Unfortunately |
| 14 |
> there has not been any progress of udept upstream in the last months. |
| 15 |
> So this ebuild fixes a few issues. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> There are other things where udept will not work properly, like it |
| 18 |
> does not know anything about EAPI's so far, which causes the |
| 19 |
> dependency and reverse dependency calculation to report false |
| 20 |
> positives. |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> dep -w works reliable though. If you are unsure you can always backup |
| 23 |
> the world file before, but when emerge -avuND world goes through |
| 24 |
> without any errors I think you are safe. |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> [1]] http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=172611 |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
Most likely I will not need it again for a while. I did save a copy to |
| 32 |
my /root directory tho just in case. After letting it do its thing, a |
| 33 |
emerge -uvDNp world came out just fine. It did remove 68 items tho. |
| 34 |
Maybe that will speed up things a little. |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
Maybe portage will stabilize a little and the dev can play catch-up or |
| 37 |
my favorite, Ketchup. LOL It seems the devs are adding a lot of |
| 38 |
"features" to portage. Not complaining or anything tho. ;-) |
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
Thanks again. |
| 41 |
|
| 42 |
Dale |
| 43 |
|
| 44 |
:-) :-) |
Archives