1 |
Florian Philipp wrote: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> Sure thing. However, it is much faster to type `echo foo> bar` than |
4 |
> writing "Open your favorite file editor and enter 'foo' into 'bar'." |
5 |
> Being concise is often the better approach when you want to show a |
6 |
> solution to the problem at hand instead of educating the reader. |
7 |
> |
8 |
> Everyone who is able to install Gentoo should be able to understand the |
9 |
> shell line and use whatever approach he wants to achieve the same result |
10 |
> and if he is satisfied with the given line, he has a copy-and-paste |
11 |
> solution at hand (my colleagues call this "service to the reader"). |
12 |
> |
13 |
> Regards, |
14 |
> Florian Philipp |
15 |
> |
16 |
> |
17 |
|
18 |
|
19 |
Yep, one could write to open a file with nano or vi. If the user knows |
20 |
what he/she is doing, opening it with kwrite would work just as good, |
21 |
unless the GUI is broken. I often get help from folks who say to edit a |
22 |
file one way but I may do something with a different tool than they |
23 |
use. Prime example being vi compared to nano. Does the same thing but |
24 |
a different tool. It's a matter of preferences is all. I use nano but |
25 |
if someone writes to use vi, I know how to change the command to work |
26 |
with nano. |
27 |
|
28 |
The biggest thing is, if a problem can't be solved on this list, it's a |
29 |
BIG problem or a nifty new feature. lol |
30 |
|
31 |
Dale |
32 |
|
33 |
:-) :-) |