Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Dale <dalek@××××××××××.net>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Again: Critical bugs considered invalid
Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 01:36:21
Message-Id: 466B5442.60802@exceedtech.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Again: Critical bugs considered invalid by "Bo Ørsted Andresen"
1 Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
2 > On Saturday 09 June 2007 15:11:48 Dale wrote:
3 >
4 >> I think replacing him with a bot thing was going to cause a lot of
5 >> trouble. I read that was their plan at least.
6 >>
7 >
8 > The bot doesn't replace him. It shows suggestions for who the right assignee
9 > would be based on metadata.xml for the package in question. At least for now.
10 > And yes, he did reconsider and decide to stay.
11 >
12 >
13
14 Yea, but whatever it would be, a human being has to be better.
15 Computers are nice but they can't do everything, else they could do the
16 "wild thing" and make faster puters on their own. LOL In that case two
17 Intel systems would create a really nice AMD rig with SATA drives. LOL
18
19 I better stop that. LOL
20
21 Dale
22
23 :-) :-) :-)