1 |
Hello. This is the strange behavor happend recently in our company. We |
2 |
use a centralized X-client computer and several dozens of X-terminals |
3 |
for the clerks. Everything works fine untill we upgraded our intranet |
4 |
web application. |
5 |
|
6 |
the new web application is very slow on Mozilla (behavior described in |
7 |
the attached message) but fast on Opera / IE. However the web |
8 |
application have other problems with Opera, for IE because we use Linux |
9 |
X-terminal, we cannot do it. These X-terminals takes 30 seconds to open |
10 |
any page in the web application / any scrolling takes another 30 |
11 |
seconds, not acceptable at all! |
12 |
|
13 |
It took us several days to discover the reason of slowdown. It's clear |
14 |
1) when the page is slow, X uses much more CPU resource then mozilla. 2) |
15 |
the speed is determined by the X-Server (X-terminal) CPU speed /rather |
16 |
then/ the X-client (X-terminal server) speed. For example, if I connect |
17 |
to X-client (X-terminal server) with my 2.5GHz desktop, the webpage is |
18 |
not slow. Also, when the X-terminal busy 30 seconds for drawing web |
19 |
application, there are lots of IDLE cpu resource on the X-client |
20 |
(X-terminal server). |
21 |
|
22 |
This really surpised me because I thought most reason affecting X speed |
23 |
is the CPU time of X-client. |
24 |
|
25 |
To solve this problem, perhaps I can choose from: |
26 |
|
27 |
1) compile a special version of mozilla to not to use much X-server |
28 |
resource (if mozilla has this compile option) |
29 |
2) to pay for extra development on the web application so that it fully |
30 |
works with Opera (very troublesome, going to cost a lot) |
31 |
3) replace the current X-terminals with windows terminals so we could |
32 |
run IE (this is a big money, also for licensing cost) |
33 |
4) replace the current X-terminals with full CPU power workstations |
34 |
(this costs even bigger money) |
35 |
|
36 |
To me 1) is the cheapest way. Any suggestions help us out? |
37 |
|
38 |
I also heard of someone talking VNC, could this technique help us? |
39 |
|
40 |
-------- Original Message -------- |
41 |
Subject: firefox/mozilla extremely slow (comparing to IE and opera) for |
42 |
my web application? |
43 |
Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2005 15:39:17 +0800 |
44 |
From: Zhang Weiwu <zhangweiwu@××××××.com> |
45 |
Newsgroups: netscape.public.mozilla.browser |
46 |
|
47 |
Hello. Is it okay to ask question regarding to web authoring? |
48 |
|
49 |
I have a web application that some users reported being extremely slow |
50 |
on mozilla/firefox, and it seems the earlier versions of them are |
51 |
slower. Take an example, with 1.2GMhz CPU it takes 8 seconds after user |
52 |
clicked a selection list until the list pops up, but on IE & Opera this |
53 |
happen in a flash. With an 2.4GMhz CPU it takes 3 or 4 seconds to pop up |
54 |
any selection list. Scrolling is very slow too, as well as repaiting |
55 |
(after switched to another application and switch back to the browser). |
56 |
|
57 |
Javascript problem comes to my mind first, but even if javascript is |
58 |
disabled, the speed is not getting any faster. The web interface is very |
59 |
complicated to analyze, to put it simple, I can describe the main |
60 |
characteristic of my web application: |
61 |
|
62 |
The interface mainly consist of several layers fixed on certain |
63 |
positions on the browser window (by using position:absolute), and a |
64 |
scrollable layer behind them. E.g. several big DIV with position |
65 |
absolute and z-index 10, and one big DIV with position absolute but |
66 |
z-index:0 Besides this main difference, I don't see anything very |
67 |
particular on my webpages. |
68 |
|
69 |
A very-similar-in-concept webpage to my web application (but much |
70 |
simpler) can be found here: |
71 |
http://www.stunicholls.myby.co.uk/layouts/body2.html |
72 |
|
73 |
Could this be the reason of being slow? Is this going to be enhanced in |
74 |
the next release of gecko/firefox/mozilla? |
75 |
|
76 |
If anyone is interested in help me dig out the reason (and may help |
77 |
improve mozilla as well), I am happy to give you access to my web |
78 |
application used in my company. |
79 |
-- |
80 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |