| 1 |
On 15/01/2015 11:10, Raffaele BELARDI wrote: |
| 2 |
> Alan McKinnon wrote: |
| 3 |
>> On 14/01/2015 15:39, Raffaele BELARDI wrote: |
| 4 |
>>> # equery d virtual/notification-daemon-0 |
| 5 |
>>> * These packages depend on virtual/notification-daemon-0: |
| 6 |
>>> x11-libs/libnotify-0.7.6-r1 (virtual/notification-daemon) |
| 7 |
>>> |
| 8 |
>>> # equery d x11-libs/libnotify |
| 9 |
>>> * These packages depend on x11-libs/libnotify: |
| 10 |
>>> media-sound/ario-1.5.1 (libnotify ? x11-libs/libnotify) |
| 11 |
>>> x11-misc/notification-daemon-3.14.1 (>=x11-libs/libnotify-0.7) |
| 12 |
>>> |
| 13 |
>>> # equery d x11-misc/notification-daemon |
| 14 |
>>> * These packages depend on x11-misc/notification-daemon: |
| 15 |
>>> virtual/notification-daemon-0 (gnome ? x11-misc/notification-daemon) |
| 16 |
>>> (!gnome ? x11-misc/notification-daemon) |
| 17 |
>>> |
| 18 |
>>> So it seems virtual/notification-daemon-0 is pulled in by |
| 19 |
>>> x11-misc/notification-daemon, which is pulled in by |
| 20 |
>>> virtual/notification-daemon-0. Where is my misunderstanding? |
| 21 |
>>> |
| 22 |
>>> thanks, |
| 23 |
>>> |
| 24 |
>>> raffaele |
| 25 |
>>> |
| 26 |
>> |
| 27 |
>> |
| 28 |
>> Are you sure your second command above is correct? I get different results: |
| 29 |
>> |
| 30 |
>> khamul ~ # equery d virtual/notification-daemon-0 |
| 31 |
>> * These packages depend on virtual/notification-daemon-0: |
| 32 |
>> x11-libs/libnotify-0.7.6-r1 (virtual/notification-daemon) |
| 33 |
>> |
| 34 |
>> |
| 35 |
>> khamul ~ # equery d x11-libs/libnotify |
| 36 |
>> * These packages depend on x11-libs/libnotify: |
| 37 |
>> app-admin/system-config-printer-gnome-1.4.3-r1 |
| 38 |
>> (x11-libs/libnotify[introspection]) |
| 39 |
>> app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-gtklibs-20140508-r6 (abi_x86_32 ? |
| 40 |
>>> =x11-libs/libnotify-0.7.6-r1[abi_x86_32(-)]) |
| 41 |
>> media-video/handbrake-0.9.9-r1 (gtk ? x11-libs/libnotify) |
| 42 |
>> media-video/vlc-2.1.5 (libnotify ? x11-libs/libnotify:0) |
| 43 |
>> www-client/midori-0.5.8-r1 (>=x11-libs/libnotify-0.7) |
| 44 |
>> |
| 45 |
>> |
| 46 |
>> khamul ~ # equery d x11-misc/notification-daemon |
| 47 |
>> * These packages depend on x11-misc/notification-daemon: |
| 48 |
>> virtual/notification-daemon-0 (gnome ? x11-misc/notification-daemon) |
| 49 |
>> (!gnome ? x11-misc/notification-daemon) |
| 50 |
>> |
| 51 |
> |
| 52 |
> Yes: |
| 53 |
> |
| 54 |
> # grep libnotify |
| 55 |
> /usr/portage/x11-misc/notification-daemon/notification-daemon-3.14.1.ebuild |
| 56 |
> >=x11-libs/libnotify-0.7 |
| 57 |
> |
| 58 |
> The problem seems to me in the x11-libs/libnotify-0.7.6-r1 ebuild, why |
| 59 |
> should a library depend on the application that uses it? |
| 60 |
> |
| 61 |
> # grep notification-daemon |
| 62 |
> /usr/portage/x11-libs/libnotify/libnotify-0.7.6-r1.ebuild |
| 63 |
> PDEPEND="virtual/notification-daemon" |
| 64 |
> |
| 65 |
> raffaele |
| 66 |
> |
| 67 |
|
| 68 |
|
| 69 |
|
| 70 |
Some interesting background on how this all works: |
| 71 |
|
| 72 |
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=488690 |
| 73 |
|
| 74 |
|
| 75 |
It's not *really* a circular dep, as there are many things out there |
| 76 |
that satisfy the virtual, x11-misc/notification-daemon is quite likely |
| 77 |
the one used least |
| 78 |
|
| 79 |
|
| 80 |
|
| 81 |
-- |
| 82 |
Alan McKinnon |
| 83 |
alan.mckinnon@×××××.com |
Archives