| 1 |
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 10:10 AM, Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Wednesday 14 Sep 2011 11:25:23 Alan Mackenzie wrote: |
| 3 |
>> On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 05:10:40PM -0400, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote: |
| 4 |
>> > > Is it simply subscribing to -dev and voicing the conversation there? |
| 5 |
>> > |
| 6 |
>> > Of course not. But please, do that if you think it will help to steer |
| 7 |
>> > Gentoo to whatever direction do you think is the correct one. |
| 8 |
>> > Personaly I don't think the devs (who, AFAIK, do not receive a single |
| 9 |
>> > dime for working on Gentoo) will appreciate anybody telling them how |
| 10 |
>> > they should do their jobs, the one they do for free. But that's just |
| 11 |
>> > me. |
| 12 |
>> |
| 13 |
>> I think so. Most devs are grateful for (polite) feedback, and take it |
| 14 |
>> into account when doing their work. I suspect they're unaware of just |
| 15 |
>> how much this change to booting is disliked by Gentoo users. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> Could someone please nudge them this way for them to get first hand feedback |
| 18 |
> on their decision. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
That's actually something I wonder. Why, if this change seems to stir |
| 21 |
so many, nobody has actually showed up in -dev? |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
>> > No, by "you know what needs to be done" I mean: code. Contribute. |
| 24 |
>> > Become a developer. Make shit happens the way you think it should |
| 25 |
>> > happen. |
| 26 |
>> > |
| 27 |
>> > Shut up and code. Google it, I didn't come with the phrase. |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
> Not all of us have the capability to code, |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
Exactly my point. And that's why I've been saying the decision is |
| 32 |
going to be made by the people who code. |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
> although all of us are grateful for |
| 35 |
> good code devs produce and often express our user needs and wants in this M/L. |
| 36 |
> |
| 37 |
> |
| 38 |
>> Just as a matter of interest, how much coding have you done for open |
| 39 |
>> source or free software? It was conspicuously absent from the CV you |
| 40 |
>> posted here a few days ago. |
| 41 |
> |
| 42 |
> Canek may wish to keep his reply off list because it wouldn't be of particular |
| 43 |
> interest to many and is not relevant with Gentoo being aligned with a flawed |
| 44 |
> (IMHO) design principle. |
| 45 |
|
| 46 |
Well said. |
| 47 |
|
| 48 |
> Better we focus our efforts instead on influencing Gentoo devs and upstream |
| 49 |
> decision making on this matter before it defaults into a design orthodoxy for |
| 50 |
> Linux. |
| 51 |
|
| 52 |
That would be a much more sensible thing to do, I would think. |
| 53 |
|
| 54 |
Regards. |
| 55 |
-- |
| 56 |
Canek Peláez Valdés |
| 57 |
Posgrado en Ciencia e Ingeniería de la Computación |
| 58 |
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México |
Archives