1 |
well chromium was just an example. I just think that when there is a |
2 |
version upgrade, a patch should be enough. |
3 |
I have read that portage is migrating to git, but I guess I got it wrong, |
4 |
because I thought that the source codes will be maintained using git too. |
5 |
However why not? why not use git for source maintenance too? |
6 |
|
7 |
regards. |
8 |
|
9 |
|
10 |
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 2:59 PM, Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> wrote: |
11 |
|
12 |
> On Tue, 29 Jul 2014 14:38:04 +0430, behrouz khosravi wrote: |
13 |
> |
14 |
> > I was trying to emerge chromium and I noticed that it should download |
15 |
> > about 200 Mb, and no wonder cause it is source files, not binary |
16 |
> > executable. However I wanted to know that if a new version of chromium |
17 |
> > comes out, an update will download another 200 Mb or just a diff files |
18 |
> > to patch the altered files ? (I am a new user and I have not |
19 |
> > experienced that situation!) |
20 |
> |
21 |
> It will download the source for the new version, which is generally a |
22 |
> separate tarball, so another 200MB. That's how Gentoo works, with very |
23 |
> few exceptions that source is downloaded and compiled. |
24 |
> |
25 |
> If you want to avoid the large download and lengthy compile time of |
26 |
> chromium, use www-client/google-chrome instead, this is the pre-compiled |
27 |
> binary from Google. |
28 |
> |
29 |
> |
30 |
> -- |
31 |
> Neil Bothwick |
32 |
> |
33 |
> EMail - garbage at the speed of light. |
34 |
> |