1 |
Neil Bothwick wrote: |
2 |
> On Sat, 21 Apr 2012 09:06:08 -0500, Dale wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
>>> Thanks again for the help : I'm now back in my 2007 machine |
5 |
>>> & able to send e-mails. You actually have to remove the offensive |
6 |
>>> file from the dir, not simply rename it to 'xx70xx...' ! |
7 |
> |
8 |
> The problem here is that the file is created automatically, so renaming |
9 |
> the old one to not end in .rules new cause it to be ignored, but a |
10 |
> one will be created. |
11 |
> |
12 |
>> That's the same way files in /etc/portage/ works too. I do wish we |
13 |
>> could put a # on the front to make it ignore files. |
14 |
> |
15 |
> The correct way to disable it is to set |
16 |
> |
17 |
> persistent_net_disable="no" |
18 |
> |
19 |
> in /etc/conf.d/udev |
20 |
> |
21 |
> |
22 |
|
23 |
|
24 |
I was referring to the files in /etc/portage with that. Although, I |
25 |
didn't know you could get it to ignore the ones for udev either, other |
26 |
than deleting/removing them of course. |
27 |
|
28 |
Dale |
29 |
|
30 |
:-) :-) |
31 |
|
32 |
-- |
33 |
I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or |
34 |
how you interpreted my words! |
35 |
|
36 |
Miss the compile output? Hint: |
37 |
EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS="--quiet-build=n" |