Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Steen Eugen Poulsen <sep@×××××××××.net>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] genkernel vs kernel manual compilation
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 22:36:23
Message-Id: 46D894C1.1070007@lix-world.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] genkernel vs kernel manual compilation by Ryan Sims
1 Ryan Sims skrev:
2 > Please stop using inflammatory language. Everyone. If you must have
3 > an argument, start a new thread or take it off list. It's perfectly
4 > fine for someone to criticize genkernel, or portage, or a hammer, or a
5 > car, or any other tool. It's also fine if you disagree with their
6 > criticisms, that's what's so great about a diverse community like
7 > gentoo; so many viewpoints. Daniels reply to your post is well said,
8 > and a perfectly valid objection to Volker's crticism, words like
9 > "hate" "drivel" "FUD" and such are *not*.
10
11 Show me where Volker is actually giving critisim. All he does is make
12 up stories that has nothing to do with what genkernel actually does.
13
14 If he at least talked about lets say the template kernels should be more
15 like LiveCD kernels or some other *PRODUCTIVE* critisim, then fine.
16
17 But no his ONLY goal here is to ruin genkernel, there is nothing in this
18 thread the author(s) can use to change the product to make Volkor happy,
19 only thing that will satisfy his attacks would be to remove the product
20 from Gentoo.

Attachments

File name MIME type
smime.p7s application/x-pkcs7-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] genkernel vs kernel manual compilation Ryan Sims <rwsims@×××××.com>