1 |
Michael Mol wrote: |
2 |
> On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 5:58 AM, Dale<rdalek1967@×××××.com> wrote: |
3 |
>> covici@××××××××××.com wrote: |
4 |
>>> Mick<michaelkintzios@×××××.com> wrote: |
5 |
>>> |
6 |
>>>> On Saturday 26 Nov 2011 15:22:15 Michael Mol wrote: |
7 |
>>>>> I just wanted to share an experience I had today with optimizing |
8 |
>>>>> parallel |
9 |
>>>>> builds after discovering "-l" for Make... |
10 |
>>>>> |
11 |
>>>>> I've got a little more tweaking I still want to do, but this is pretty |
12 |
>>>>> awesome... |
13 |
>>>>> |
14 |
>>>>> http://funnybutnot.wordpress.com/2011/11/26/optimizing-parallel-builds/ |
15 |
>>>>> |
16 |
>>>>> ZZ |
17 |
>>>> Thanks for sharing! How do you determine the optimum value for -l? |
18 |
>>> How do you get emerge not to display number of jobs and load average -- |
19 |
>>> I only want to compile one at a time -- much safer that way and it is |
20 |
>>> doing that, but now it displays all that load average and how many jobs, |
21 |
>>> etc. -- any way to get rid of that display? |
22 |
>>> |
23 |
>> Thank Zac for that. He thinks he knows what you want. ;-) Apparently not |
24 |
>> huh? |
25 |
>> |
26 |
>> http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-901858.html |
27 |
>> |
28 |
>> Just add --quiet-build=n to EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS in make.conf and it will do |
29 |
>> it the old way. |
30 |
> Oh! I hadn't realized there was an update to portage that changed |
31 |
> that. Missed it on my main box, I suppose. |
32 |
|
33 |
You have got to crawl out of the hole every once in a while. It was on |
34 |
-dev then got moved over to the forums with a poll, which the results |
35 |
were ignored. |
36 |
|
37 |
Bad thing is, they won't announce the change until it hits stable. I'm |
38 |
thinking of adding it to my sig so people will notice it and not have to |
39 |
ask. |
40 |
|
41 |
< sighs > |
42 |
|
43 |
Dale |
44 |
|
45 |
:-) :-) |
46 |
|
47 |
-- |
48 |
I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how you interpreted my words! |