1 |
On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 10:18 AM, Alan McKinnon<alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> wrote: |
2 |
> On Saturday 27 June 2009 19:10:43 Mark Knecht wrote: |
3 |
>> On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 2:34 AM, Alan McKinnon<alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> |
4 |
> wrote: |
5 |
>> > On Saturday 27 June 2009 06:24:12 Mark Knecht wrote: |
6 |
>> >> On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 12:30 PM, Alan McKinnon<alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> |
7 |
>> > |
8 |
>> > wrote: |
9 |
>> >> > On Friday 26 June 2009 21:05:01 Mark Knecht wrote: |
10 |
>> >> >> So the weirdness continues. mesa built but then xorg-server failed |
11 |
>> >> >> with the same failure: |
12 |
>> >> >> |
13 |
>> >> >> |
14 |
>> >> >> * >>> SetUID: [chmod go-r] /usr/bin/Xorg ... |
15 |
>> >> >> [ ok ] |
16 |
>> >> >> |
17 |
>> >> >> Switching to xorg-x11 OpenGL interface...ln: creating symbolic link |
18 |
>> >> >> `./libglx.so': File exists |
19 |
>> >> >> !!! Error: Failed to create /lib/libglx.so |
20 |
>> >> > |
21 |
>> >> > Looks like you have a file collision between xorg-server and mesa, |
22 |
>> >> > which is odd as those packages get a lot of testing. |
23 |
>> >> > |
24 |
>> >> > Anything on bugs.gentoo.org? |
25 |
>> >> |
26 |
>> >> Unfortunately it seem that there are bug reports on this and more |
27 |
>> >> unfortunately they have apparently been going on nearly a year now. |
28 |
>> >> It's not a Gentoo thing specifically as there are Ubuntu, Debian and |
29 |
>> >> other distros with reports in their forums. |
30 |
>> >> |
31 |
>> >> There was a possible by hand fix for it but I'll need to look at that |
32 |
>> >> over the weekend to see if it makes sense on this machine. |
33 |
>> >> |
34 |
>> >> Bummer. I hate banging my head up against a wall made of problems no |
35 |
>> >> one seems to be fixing. |
36 |
>> >> |
37 |
>> >> http://bugs.gentoo.org/247685 |
38 |
>> > |
39 |
>> > The fix seems (in principle at least) to be brain-dead easy: |
40 |
>> > |
41 |
>> > - all ebuilds that merge opengl files should put them in distinct |
42 |
>> > locations by name to avoid collisions |
43 |
>> > - the contents of /usr/lib64/opengl/xorg-x11/extensions/ should be |
44 |
>> > symlinks with a sane default put there by xorg-server and modified by |
45 |
>> > eselect |
46 |
>> > |
47 |
>> > Nikos's comments are especially sane in that thread. Perhaps he'll come |
48 |
>> > along, see this thread and help you out further. |
49 |
>> > |
50 |
>> > I suspect that the temporary workaround will be to delete a symlink and |
51 |
>> > emerge stuff, then remember to always do this on every future re-emerge |
52 |
>> > |
53 |
>> > -- |
54 |
>> > alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com |
55 |
>> |
56 |
>> In concept it does seem fairly straight forward, but to some extent |
57 |
>> I'm not clear why my previous attempts didn't work, unless the |
58 |
>> questionable files remained behind. What I attempted to do was |
59 |
>> completely remove everything X, but I probably didn't specifically |
60 |
>> remove the stuff in /usr/lib/opengl/xorg-x11/extensions. I was |
61 |
>> expecting the emerge to do that. |
62 |
> |
63 |
> According to the bug report you mentioned earlier, the ebuild is attempting to |
64 |
> perform eselect too late in the process, which fails, and the ebuild |
65 |
> immediately exits. |
66 |
> |
67 |
> So it's not surprising that dodgy files are left behind which you must remove |
68 |
> manually. |
69 |
> |
70 |
> -- |
71 |
> alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com |
72 |
> |
73 |
> |
74 |
So I'm little confused by a couple of the postings in that report. I |
75 |
did emerge -C glproto/eselect/mesa/xorg-server and then made sure |
76 |
there was nothing left in those directories at all. Should I emerge |
77 |
eselect, manually do a select, and then emerge the rest of the files? |
78 |
|
79 |
Or emerge eselect and maybe mesa, do the eselect, then xorg-server? |
80 |
|
81 |
mesa is currently building. glproto created |
82 |
/usr/lib/opengl/xorg-x11/include, but the other two directories are |
83 |
there yet. |
84 |
|
85 |
Cheers, |
86 |
Mark |