| 1 |
James Wall wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 6:39 PM, Grant<emailgrant@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
>>> No trees were harmed in the sending of this message. However, a large |
| 6 |
>>> number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced. |
| 7 |
>>> |
| 8 |
>> That's hilarious. :) |
| 9 |
>> |
| 10 |
>> - Grant |
| 11 |
>> |
| 12 |
>> |
| 13 |
> Thanks. A friend shared that with me. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
I post some of Neil's sig lines to my wall on facebook. A lot of them |
| 18 |
are pretty neat. What gets me tho is when one of them applies to the |
| 19 |
topic he is replying too. I know on a couple occasion Neil has even |
| 20 |
mentioned it himself. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Keep em coming Neil. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Dale |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
:-) :-) |
Archives