Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Boa is now hard masked?
Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 20:13:43
Message-Id: 200705182107.12721.michaelkintzios@gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Boa is now hard masked? by "Bo Ørsted Andresen"
1 On Friday 18 May 2007 17:15, Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
2 > On Friday 18 May 2007 18:10:41 Mick wrote:
3 > > !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy "boa" have been masked.
4 > > !!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your
5 > > request: - www-servers/boa-0.94.14_alpha20 (masked by: package.mask, ~x86
6 > > keyword) # Raúl Porcel <armin76@g.o> (18 May 2007)
7 > > # For treecleaners, bug 102174
8 > > # Pending removal 17 Jul 2007
9 >
10 > So there is your answer. I looked in anoncvs but it hasn't reached that
11 > either yet... ;)
12
13 Fair do's. Took some time to look at the bug and it seems that thttpd is
14 suggested as a valid replacement which unlike continues to be maintained.
15
16 @Neil: I haven't looked much into NFS because it seems more involved (running
17 portmap also has security aspects to consider) than just running a little
18 server every now and then - but may be I'm wrong.
19 --
20 Regards,
21 Mick