1 |
On Friday 18 May 2007 17:15, Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote: |
2 |
> On Friday 18 May 2007 18:10:41 Mick wrote: |
3 |
> > !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy "boa" have been masked. |
4 |
> > !!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your |
5 |
> > request: - www-servers/boa-0.94.14_alpha20 (masked by: package.mask, ~x86 |
6 |
> > keyword) # Raúl Porcel <armin76@g.o> (18 May 2007) |
7 |
> > # For treecleaners, bug 102174 |
8 |
> > # Pending removal 17 Jul 2007 |
9 |
> |
10 |
> So there is your answer. I looked in anoncvs but it hasn't reached that |
11 |
> either yet... ;) |
12 |
|
13 |
Fair do's. Took some time to look at the bug and it seems that thttpd is |
14 |
suggested as a valid replacement which unlike continues to be maintained. |
15 |
|
16 |
@Neil: I haven't looked much into NFS because it seems more involved (running |
17 |
portmap also has security aspects to consider) than just running a little |
18 |
server every now and then - but may be I'm wrong. |
19 |
-- |
20 |
Regards, |
21 |
Mick |