Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Marc Joliet <marcec@×××.de>
To: Gentoo-User ML <gentoo-user@l.g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Goodbye, Gentoo
Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 12:58:41
Message-Id: 20110527145635.6b097bde@marcec.huntemann.uni-oldenburg.de
In Reply to: [gentoo-user] Goodbye, Gentoo by Kevin O'Gorman
1 Am Thu, 26 May 2011 16:28:46 -0700
2 schrieb "Kevin O'Gorman" <kogorman@×××××.com>:
3
4 > It looks like it's time to take Gentoo off of my main machine. I feel a
5 > little sad about it, or I'd just quietly go away.
6 >
7 > A few months ago, an update made the machine headless -- well, it could no
8 > longer bring up X but I could use the console-mode for admin, and log in via
9 > SSH from my laptop and run GUI programs. I was busy at the time, first
10 > deciding and then implementing my retirement, so I let it go.
11 >
12 > Now, a couple of months into my retirement, I'm trying to fix things up, and
13 > the latest Gentoo live disk cannot talk to my monitor at all. Whatever it's
14 > trying is unacceptable to the HD monitor I've had on there for a year, and I
15 > can't even run the consoles. The video card is an ATI Rage XL on the
16 > motherboard. Like the rest of the machine, it's vintage 2000, so maybe
17 > support got dropped.
18 [...]
19
20 (I realise your decision is made, but if this is the bug I think it is, this
21 has nothing to do with Gentoo in particular.)
22
23 I wonder which kernel version you use, because in 2.6.36/37 I was hit by a nasty
24 EDID parsing bug. Actually, IIRC the code for parsing EDIDs was updated to
25 understand more features or something, and that triggered errors that didn't
26 come up before because those parts of the response from the monitor were simply
27 ignored until then (or something like that). This lead to my own monitor not
28 responding for over a minute at a time (sometimes going blank in between) and
29 other people complained that it left theirs permanently blank.
30
31 I think this is the original bug:
32
33 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31943
34
35 which contains a workaround (with patch):
36
37 "The drm EDID checker is pretty strict about what EDIDs it will accept. Try
38 this patch and add drm.edid_strict=0 to your kernel command line."
39
40 For me, upgrading to 2.6.38 helped, I don't see the problem anymore (though
41 other people report otherwise).
42
43 *If* this is the bug, it makes me wonder why you don't see it under Ubuntu.
44
45 Good luck with Ubuntu!
46 --
47 Marc Joliet
48 --
49 "People who think they know everything really annoy those of us who know we
50 don't" - Bjarne Stroustrup

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] No KMS for ATI Rage* (was: Goodbye, Gentoo) Felix Miata <mrmazda@×××××××××.net>
Re: [gentoo-user] Goodbye, Gentoo Kevin O'Gorman <kogorman@×××××.com>