| 1 |
Am 04.12.2014 um 17:30 schrieb Michael Vetter: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> Yes, thats what I want to achive. |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
The sad thing about hibernation is, that it has always kinda been some |
| 6 |
kind of lackluster in the kernel and quite disappointing. It is a kind |
| 7 |
of area which does not get much love in the kernel for at least over one |
| 8 |
decade. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
he number of computers it does not work is bigger than the number of |
| 11 |
computers it does work on correctly. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
At least last time I tried it it was quite like that. Hibernation is |
| 14 |
disabled by default on Ubuntu 14.04, because it is so unreliable and |
| 15 |
broken. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
In fact, there are three different kind of implementations around namely: |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
a) the thing in the main line kernel, which seems to work quite subpar, |
| 20 |
which is being used by the utility swsusp, |
| 21 |
b) something in the user space being called uswsusp, |
| 22 |
c) and an alternative implementation for the kernel being named "Tux on |
| 23 |
Ice." |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Many do consider Tux on Ice the most reliable way to get hibernation up |
| 26 |
and running on Linux, unfortunately development seems to be stalled |
| 27 |
since always about one year and it is not part of the main line kernel. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
So if you want to get this working reliable, good luck. You'll need it. |
Archives