1 |
On Wednesday 20 December 2006 19:42, Mark Knecht wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> As for family members not a single one of them, except possibly my |
4 |
> son today could even have a chance of setting up a Linux box. |
5 |
|
6 |
Looks like you are assuming stuff up front and never actually getting |
7 |
round to checking it out for real |
8 |
|
9 |
> My |
10 |
> son's first computer was RH when he was 6 or 7. Today's he's 14, runs |
11 |
> Gentoo, rips CDs, uses Aqualung & xmms. He *might* get through a RH |
12 |
> install but not Gentoo. |
13 |
|
14 |
Can't he read or something? Gentoo's install is more heavily documented |
15 |
than any other distro out there |
16 |
|
17 |
> It's not that Gentoo is so hard. It's that |
18 |
> none of them know anything about 'vi' so how could they even edit a |
19 |
> config file and give the system an IP address or point it at a name |
20 |
> server? |
21 |
|
22 |
The basic installer does not provide vi for this exact reason. It |
23 |
provides nano, so this objection doesn't even rear it's head |
24 |
|
25 |
> (Maybe the graphical installer but I'd not let them try for |
26 |
> fear they'd wreck existing Windows installs trying to load it.) |
27 |
|
28 |
The risk that the user might nuke the partitions containing Windows is |
29 |
always there regardless of what distro you use. You still make the same |
30 |
decisions, fdisk, cfdisk and gparted are still there. Whether you click |
31 |
here, click OK then say "oops..." or type "fdisk /dev/sda" <some stuff> |
32 |
then say "oops" you're still gonna say "oops" .... |
33 |
|
34 |
alan |
35 |
-- |
36 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |