Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Alan McKinnon <alan@××××××××××××××××.za>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Is Gentoo healthy?
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 07:23:52
Message-Id: 200612210920.42557.alan@linuxholdings.co.za
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Is Gentoo healthy? by Mark Knecht
1 On Wednesday 20 December 2006 19:42, Mark Knecht wrote:
2
3 > As for family members not a single one of them, except possibly my
4 > son today could even have a chance of setting up a Linux box.
5
6 Looks like you are assuming stuff up front and never actually getting
7 round to checking it out for real
8
9 > My
10 > son's first computer was RH when he was 6 or 7. Today's he's 14, runs
11 > Gentoo, rips CDs, uses Aqualung & xmms. He *might* get through a RH
12 > install but not Gentoo.
13
14 Can't he read or something? Gentoo's install is more heavily documented
15 than any other distro out there
16
17 > It's not that Gentoo is so hard. It's that
18 > none of them know anything about 'vi' so how could they even edit a
19 > config file and give the system an IP address or point it at a name
20 > server?
21
22 The basic installer does not provide vi for this exact reason. It
23 provides nano, so this objection doesn't even rear it's head
24
25 > (Maybe the graphical installer but I'd not let them try for
26 > fear they'd wreck existing Windows installs trying to load it.)
27
28 The risk that the user might nuke the partitions containing Windows is
29 always there regardless of what distro you use. You still make the same
30 decisions, fdisk, cfdisk and gparted are still there. Whether you click
31 here, click OK then say "oops..." or type "fdisk /dev/sda" <some stuff>
32 then say "oops" you're still gonna say "oops" ....
33
34 alan
35 --
36 gentoo-user@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Is Gentoo healthy? Jeff Rollin <jeff.rollin@×××××.com>