1 |
On Wed, 09 May 2007 18:31:07 -0600, darren kirby wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> quoth the Neil Bothwick: |
4 |
> > On Wed, 09 May 2007 15:49:45 -0600, darren kirby wrote: |
5 |
> > > I have heard you can use a separate /usr to enhance security by |
6 |
> > > mounting it readonly under normal circumstances. This way, bad guys |
7 |
> > > can't mess with your binaries in /usr/bin and /usr/sbin, |
8 |
> > |
9 |
> > Instead of only being able to get at the really important stuff |
10 |
> > in /bin and /sbin? |
11 |
> |
12 |
> Well, very nice how you trimmed the part of my original email that |
13 |
> speaks to your question and makes the same point as you, but thanks for |
14 |
> making me look stupid anyway... |
15 |
|
16 |
The part I trimmed was "though it seems to me if they have access |
17 |
to mess with your /usr they can mess with anything anyway so..." which I |
18 |
guess could mean what you say you meant rather than how I read it. Sorry |
19 |
if you think I twisted your post, that wasn't my intention. |
20 |
|
21 |
|
22 |
-- |
23 |
Neil Bothwick |
24 |
|
25 |
Remember that the Titanic was built by experts, and the Ark by a newbie |